Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effectiveness of using Flashvocal learning media in improving students' writing skills and their interest in learning to write English. Flashvocal is an interactive learning media that combines visual, audio, and written text elements that aim to improve students' language skills, especially in composing descriptive texts. The research method used is a quantitative method with a quasi-experimental approach involving two classes of eighth grade students at SMPN 1 Tinambung. One class as an experimental class uses Flashvocal in learning, while the control class is taught using conventional methods. Data were collected through pre-test, post-test, and questionnaires to determine changes in students' writing skills and learning interests. The results of data analysis showed that although there was an increase in the average post-test score in the experimental class from 9.68 to 11.84, the results of the Independent Samples T-Test showed a significance value (2-tailed) of 0.436, greater than 0.05. This indicates that there is no statistically significant difference between the experimental class and the control class in terms of improving writing skills. However, based on descriptive analysis and student responses through questionnaires, the use of Flashvocal showed a positive influence in improving writing organization, idea development, and student motivation in writing. Thus, Flashvocal has practical potential in increasing student engagement and enriching the writing learning process in the classroom.

Keywords

Flashvocal, writing skills, descriptive text, student interest, English learning media

Article Details

References

  1. Ary, D. (2010). Pengantar metodologi penelitian. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 1(1), 1-10.
  2. Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
  3. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  4. Dalman, H. (2015). Pembelajaran menulis. Bandung: Alfabeta. (hlm. 4, mengutip Suparno & Yunus).
  5. Dalman. (2018). Pembelajaran menulis: Kreativitas dan komunikasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 13(1), 1-10. (hlm. 3).
  6. Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
  7. Emzir (2009). Pendekatan penelitian kuantitatif dalam ilmu pengetahuan. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmiah, 5(1), 12-25.
  8. Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and interpretation (11th ed., pp. 123-145). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson. ISBN: 978-0-13- 383153-3
  9. Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2016). The power of interest for motivation and engagement. In K. R. Wentzel & D. B. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197-214). New York: Routledge.
  11. Kerlinger, F. N. (1973). Foundations of behavioral research. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  12. Kerlinger, F. N. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (Edisi 4). Thomson Learning.
  13. Margono. (2017). Konsep dasar penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan, 10(1), 1-10.
  14. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85-139.
  15. Nurhayati, dkk. (2020). Pengembangan Flashvocal untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Memori dan Pemahaman Konsep Bahasa Inggris Siswa. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 12(2), 101-114.
  16. Nurhadi. (2017). Kompetensi menulis sebagai kemampuan berbahasa. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 10(2), 123-135.
  17. Nasution. (2004). Metodologi penelitian. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(2), 100-110.
  18. Nazir, M. (2017). Metode penelitian. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 10(1), 1-10.
  19. Nawawi, H. (2017). Metode penelitian bidang sosial. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sosial, 6(2), 123-135.
  20. O’Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic Assessment for English Language Learners: Practical Approaches for Teachers. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
  21. Putra, A., & Wijaya, D. (2018). Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Flash dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Reading Comprehension Siswa SMP. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan.
  22. Sujana. (2009). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo. Sudaryanto. 2003. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  23. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 1-10.
  24. Sugiyono. (2013). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 6(1), 1-10.
  25. Sugiyono, A. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 1-10.
  26. Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  27. Sugiyono, M. (2012). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 1-10.
  28. Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 1-10.
  29. Sugiono. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D (pp. 234-256). Bandung: Alfabeta. ISBN: 978-602-9402-45-5
  30. Wahyuni, S., dkk. (2019). Evaluasi Efektivitas Flashvocal dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 10(1), 45-58.